How the Best University Marketing Teams Operate as One

At most universities, marketing isn’t one team. It’s central marketing, plus the individual colleges, plus athletics, advancement, admissions, and the medical center, with a few outside agencies layered on top. On paper, that’s one institution. In practice, it’s a dozen marketing teams that share a logo, and most of them don’t report to you. Your job, as the CMO or VP of Marketing, is to make all of them look and move like one institution to everyone on the outside.

We’ve spent two decades inside that setup with hundreds of colleges and universities, and the work itself is almost never the problem. Talented people ship good work at every size, from a five-person central shop to a 150-person operation spread across campus. What changes as you grow is whether anyone can see across all those teams well enough to run them as one. The first thing to break isn’t strategy or talent. It’s visibility.

The outside pressure only adds to it. The demographic cliff is pulling roughly 15% of 18-year-olds out of the pipeline through 2030, which has pushed enrollment marketing to the center of the strategy conversation while most operating models stayed where they were a decade ago. Brand research from firms like SimpsonScarborough keeps showing that when your brand shows up inconsistently across campus, prospective students notice, and it costs you.

---

How does university marketing change as an institution grows?

University marketing matures through three stages as an institution grows, and where you land depends less on headcount than on how spread out the function has become. Each stage works fine, right up until the moment it doesn’t.

Stage 1. Small central team, 3 to 15 marketers. One team handles everything that goes out the door, and the queue is really set by whoever asked most recently. The recurring work (recruitment, the annual fund, commencement) gets rebuilt from memory every cycle. It stops working the moment two enrollment projects collide with reunion weekend and you realize the team just spent a semester on the loudest request instead of the most important one.

Stage 2. Fragmented and fraying, 15 to 60 marketers. Every college has hired its own marketer, so now there are half a dozen versions of the brand and nowhere to see them side by side. You’re accountable for a consistency you can’t actually enforce. This is where most institutions get stuck. It stops working the moment a cabinet member asks what everyone across the institution is working on right now, and the only honest answer is a two-week sweep through every dean’s office, every tool, and every agency.

Stage 3. Distributed enterprise, 60 to 150-plus marketers. Marketing is now an institution-wide function with no institution-wide system, and most of the people doing it don’t report to you. Your job quietly shifts from making the work to governing it. It stops working the moment the board wants a live, institution-wide picture of brand, enrollment marketing, and reputation risk, and pulling it together would take six weeks you don’t have.

The tools always look like the culprit (central’s on one platform, the business school’s on another, athletics lives in a shared drive, the medical center’s off on its own), but they’re the symptom, not the cause. Each choice made sense on its own. Together they make a single view impossible, which is why your authority over these teams ends up being influence rather than infrastructure.

The way out isn’t more authority. It’s shared infrastructure, the one thing a platform like Workzone is built to provide. If you want the whole map, the tier-by-tier explorer and a 14-question self-audit are in the Higher Education Marketing Benchmark.

---

What do the best university marketing teams do differently?

They standardize the seams, not the interior. They share visibility and approvals across every team while letting each unit keep its own internal workflow, and that single principle is what separates the institutions that scale from the ones that stall.

The move that fails is the one almost every new CMO reaches for first: trying to pull every team onto one system using authority they don’t actually have on the org chart. The directive goes out, two quarters to standardize. The units that report to deans quietly opt out, the Provost won’t force the issue, and the whole effort stalls before the conversation that matters even starts.

The institutions that pull this off do the opposite. Each team keeps its own rhythm, and only the two shared things, visibility across teams and approvals, get standardized. The shared layer just has to be good enough that people move onto it because it’s faster, not because they were told to. A purpose-built platform like Workzone is how most institutions make that shared layer fast enough that teams actually choose it.

The same idea runs through the rest of it: build approvals around the reviewers who actually matter (deans, donors, counsel, accreditors) instead of the people who live in the tool all day, make going through brand quicker than going around it, and put one marketing-ops or PMO person in charge of intake so you set priorities instead of being the inbox. When an institution doesn’t have that ops function at all, that is usually the whole problem.

---

How do you justify more marketing headcount in higher ed?

You make the work visible. When you can’t see across the teams, you can’t prove what your people are carrying, so a staffing request lands like a gut feeling. The workload is heavy, but “we’re slammed” isn’t a number, and the budget conversation runs on numbers, which means leadership funds what it can see.

The best teams change that. Because the work lives in one shared system with a portfolio view, they can put volume, throughput, and the exact bottleneck on the table. Nick Alvarado, VP of Communications and Creative Services at Texas State Technical College, made the point directly: No one can just take your word anymore. It’s because of Workzone that I’ve been able to say ‘I need two more people,’ and we’ve been able to add those resources.

Visibility turns a headcount request from a gut feeling into a case you can defend.

---

See how the best university marketing teams operate

The three stages, the challenges that surface at each one, and a 14-question self-audit are all in How the Best-Run Higher Education Marketing Teams Actually Operate. It scores your operating maturity against peer institutions your size and points to the gaps worth closing first. It is the clearest way to see which stage you are in today and what the next one will ask of your team.

Workzone is the shared operating layer many institutions put underneath the work. Each team gets its own workspace that rolls up into one portfolio view, intake runs through a single front door, and approvals bring deans, donors, and accreditors in natively with a record of every version. In the benchmark’s composite cases, teams that put this layer in place cut recurring-program cycle times by 25 to 40%, turned cabinet reporting from a multi-week scramble into a saved view, and cut one CMO’s reporting load by about two-thirds.

Start with the benchmark to find your stage. When you are ready to see the operating layer in practice, you can schedule at quick chat for 15 minutes.

---

Frequently asked questions

Why is project coordination so hard for university marketing teams? Higher-ed marketing is structurally decentralized, not a single team. Central marcom, the college marketers, athletics, advancement, and the medical center each run their own staff, tools, and calendars while serving one institution, so the work breaks at the handoffs between them. No single system shows who is doing what across all of them, which is why a simple cabinet question can require a two-week sweep. The Workzone Higher Education Marketing Benchmark maps how this evolves across three stages of scale.

What is the best project management software for higher education marketing teams? The best fit for a university marketing org standardizes the seams between units (cross-unit visibility and structured approvals) without forcing every team onto one internal workflow. Workzone gives each unit its own workspace and rolls all active work into one portfolio view, supports unlimited occasional reviewers like deans and donors, and is built specifically for higher ed with two decades of experience across central, colleges, athletics, advancement, and medical centers.

How do I get marketing visibility across multiple departments and campuses? Visibility comes from a shared operating layer with one intake path and one portfolio view, rather than standardizing every department onto an identical workflow. Standardize the seams, not the interior: let each unit keep its internal cadence, but require cross-unit work and approvals to run in the shared system. That gives leadership a live view across central and every unit without emailing each team for a status update.

How can I justify more marketing headcount to university leadership? Make the work visible. When volume, throughput, and bottlenecks live in a shared system with a portfolio view, you can show leadership exactly what your team is carrying and where it breaks without help, which turns a headcount request from a hunch into a data-backed case. As Texas State Technical College’s VP of Communications put it, that visibility is what let him say “I need two more people” and actually get them.

How long does Workzone take to implement at a university? Workzone goes live in about three weeks without a consultant. It is digitally led and human supported, with training from product specialists, so adoption holds across many separate departments. The average Workzone customer stays seven years.

---