8 Measurable Benefits of Project Management Software, Backed by Real-World Results

More projects completed. Hours of time back. Fewer missed deadlines. Smarter staffing. See the measurable impact project management software can have on your team.

If you are looking for project management software, there is a good chance the problem did not start with software.

It probably started with work.

There is more of it than there used to be. More projects, more requests, more stakeholders, more approvals, and more people who need to know where things stand. The spreadsheet that used to work fine now requires constant maintenance. Project updates are spread across meetings, email, and chat. Someone has become the unofficial keeper of project status. Managers spend more time coordinating work, while team members spend more time figuring out what needs their attention.

Eventually, adding another spreadsheet, process, or weekly status meeting stops helping. That is usually when organizations start evaluating project management software.

The natural place to start is with features. Does it have Gantt charts? Can we create templates? Does it have workload reporting? Can people submit requests? Can we automate reminders?

Those questions matter, but there is a more useful question to answer first:

What should actually get better if you choose the right project management software?

At Workzone, we have had the opportunity to see what happens as customers use project management software over time. Across universities, health systems, financial institutions, nonprofits, manufacturers, and other organizations, the benefits show up in measurable ways. Teams complete more work. They recover hours that used to be consumed by coordination. Repeatable work becomes standardized. Managers get better at seeing capacity problems before deadlines suffer. Project data starts informing decisions about staffing, budgets, and how the organization operates.

The interesting part is how those benefits build on one another.

---

What are the main benefits of project management software?

Project management software can help teams complete more work with the same resources, get productive time back, automate recurring workflows, keep deadlines from slipping, manage workload and capacity, create visibility across teams, improve planning, and achieve better business outcomes.

Here is what those benefits can look like in practice.

1. Get more projects across the finish line with the same team

Most teams looking for project management software are already busy. The challenge is how much effort gets consumed by managing the work around the work.

A new project needs to be set up. Someone needs to collect the requirements. A manager has to determine who can take it. People need reminders. Stakeholders want updates. Approvals need to be chased. When something slips, someone has to notice and intervene.

As workload grows, so does this coordination effort. Eventually, the team can feel as though everyone is working harder without getting proportionately more out the door.

How does project management software improve productivity?

One of the most useful measures of project management software is whether an existing team can successfully complete more work.

At Texas State Technical College, the team increased the number of projects it completed annually by nearly 70% while coordinating work across 10 campuses.

The V Foundation for Cancer Research increased completed project throughput by 87%. Ebenezer increased completed project throughput by 109%. Regal Medical Group increased annual project volume by 98%. University of Wisconsin increased completed projects by 53%.

Mercyhealth provides another example. Its project volume increased approximately 40% with the same team, even as the organization absorbed additional work associated with roughly 15 clinics and a hospital.

The numbers vary, but the benefit is consistent. Better project management can increase the amount of work an existing team is able to absorb and complete.

That distinction matters when evaluating software. Almost any modern platform can technically hold a large portfolio of projects and tasks. What matters is whether your team can successfully manage more work after implementing it.

And that leads to a larger question about where your team’s existing capacity is going.

2. Get hours of productive time back every week

Think about a normal week and all the small interactions required to keep projects moving.

A stakeholder asks for an update. Someone follows up on an approval. A manager tries to figure out who can take another assignment. Someone searches for the latest version of a document. A task has not started, so somebody sends a reminder. A recurring project needs to launch, so a project manager reconstructs a familiar process.

Each interaction may take only a few minutes. Across an entire team and an entire year, those minutes become significant.

How much time can project management software save?

Some Workzone customers have quantified what happens when that coordination effort is reduced.

Baxter Credit Union estimates that streamlining and automating work delivery frees approximately 10 to 15 hours per week per team member.

Mercyhealth estimates that its team gets back approximately 5 to 10 hours per person per week.

Kansas State University estimates savings of at least one hour per project, which the team described as the equivalent of freeing up half a person per project.

At University of Missouri-Kansas City, account-management staff can answer project-status questions themselves instead of relying on the production team to provide updates.

Even modest improvements add up quickly. If a 10-person team recovers five hours per person each week, that represents 50 hours of additional capacity every week, or roughly 2,600 hours over a year.

Those hours can be used to take on additional work, spend more time on strategy, improve quality, respond faster, or give an overloaded team more capacity to deal with peaks in demand.

This is also why automation deserves careful attention when comparing project management systems. Its value grows when it removes recurring coordination work across an entire portfolio.

Project setup is a good example.

3. Automate the work your team repeats again and again

Most organizations have more repeatable work than they initially realize.

The subject of a marketing campaign changes, but much of the production process stays the same. A university newsletter follows a familiar sequence every time it goes out. Events require many of the same steps and approvals. Client onboarding, product launches, creative requests, monthly reports, and operational processes often follow recognizable patterns.

Without a shared system, much of that process lives in people’s heads. Someone remembers what comes next, who needs to approve something, when another department needs to get involved, and which steps cannot be skipped.

Project management software gives organizations a way to capture that knowledge in the workflow itself.

How do project templates and workflow automation save time?

At G-III Apparel Group, 100% of recently created projects were launched from templates.

At The V Foundation for Cancer Research, 97% of projects are created from templates. At York College of Pennsylvania, the figure is approximately 98%, with recurring projects launching established workflows for activities such as its biweekly newsletter and monthly presidential video.

University of Mary creates 100% of its projects from templates or copies. At Innovative Print, template usage reached 99%, and the team described its templates as effectively functioning as its standard operating procedure system.

The benefit compounds over time.

The first time you build a reusable workflow, you save some setup time. After that workflow has been used dozens or hundreds of times, the organization has avoided repeatedly reconstructing the same process. New employees inherit established ways of working. Handoffs become more consistent. Important steps are less dependent on memory. Managers spend less time making sure the process is being followed.

The organization’s accumulated knowledge about how to execute work becomes part of the system.

That creates capacity, but higher capacity introduces another challenge.

4. Keep deadlines from slipping as workload grows

A team managing a relatively small portfolio can compensate for weak systems with human effort. Managers know most of the projects personally. They remember which deadlines are at risk. They can ask around when something seems stuck.

As volume grows, that becomes much harder.

Managers need to know where work has stopped, where a dependency is causing a delay, where an approval is overdue, and where someone’s workload makes a deadline unrealistic.

This is where project health and throughput need to be considered together.

At University of Wisconsin, completed projects increased by 53% while 95% of projects remained on track.

The V Foundation for Cancer Research increased completed project throughput by 87% while 88% of active projects remained on track.

ProSource Wholesale reported 0% of tasks more than 30 days overdue. Vitruvian Health Care System also reported 0% of tasks more than 30 days overdue.

For someone evaluating project management software, these combinations are more useful than a platform’s theoretical capacity.

The system needs to help managers find the work that requires attention. A project that has stopped moving should be visible. A missed dependency should surface before it causes a larger delay. A manager should be able to see that the person responsible for the next step is already overloaded.

A deadline can look perfectly reasonable in a project plan and still be unrealistic because the person responsible has too much other work due at the same time. Once project plans and workload are visible together, managers can identify that problem earlier.

5. See who’s overloaded before work gets stuck

Ask a busy team whether it needs more people and you will often get an immediate yes.

For leadership, the decision is more complicated.

How much work is the team handling? How quickly is demand growing? Is the entire team overloaded, or are particular roles creating the constraint? Would another employee increase output, or is inefficient coordination consuming capacity that already exists?

Those questions are difficult to answer when work is spread across spreadsheets, inboxes, meetings, and personal task lists.

How does project management software help with resource planning?

At Texas State Technical College, capacity and workload data helped the team make the case for additional hires and additional budget.

The V Foundation for Cancer Research used workload and request data to help justify an additional designer.

University of Missouri-Kansas City has used Workzone reporting to support its case for additional resources.

At Tampa General Hospital, capacity information is used to inform hiring decisions and manager accountability.

Project management data can therefore serve a purpose beyond scheduling work. It can help leaders understand how the organization is using its people and where constraints are developing.

A manager can show where capacity is tight, how workload is changing, and what additional resources could allow the team to accomplish.

Sometimes the data supports hiring. In other cases, it may show that standardizing a process or redistributing work would create additional capacity. Both conclusions are useful.

This is also why incoming demand matters. You cannot understand capacity without understanding what is coming into the team.

For organizations receiving work from many internal stakeholders, structured intake gives managers a clearer picture of demand before it becomes another assignment buried in someone’s inbox. Requests can be collected consistently, evaluated, prioritized, and turned into structured projects when they are approved.

Once demand and capacity are visible in the same environment, organizations can make better decisions about what they can realistically take on.

6. Give everyone one place to see what’s happening

Many project management systems enter an organization through one department.

One team has a problem, finds a platform, and starts using it. Over time, other teams need to participate. Leadership wants visibility. Work begins crossing departmental boundaries.

At that point, the value of a shared system expands.

Purdue University uses Workzone as a single source of truth for active and planned work across 11 departments and 92 counties, supporting more than 300 internal stakeholders.

Tampa General Hospital uses Workzone across 9 departments and more than 600 users.

Texas State Technical College coordinates work across 10 campuses.

Legacy Health has centralized project visibility across a six-hospital system.

Kansas State University supports more than 100 internal stakeholders through its project management process.

At this scale, project management is about more than an individual knowing what to do next.

Stakeholders need to know where their work stands. Department leaders need visibility into what is coming. Managers need to understand workload. Executives need a useful view across the portfolio.

When that information is already present in the project system, the team doing the work does not have to continually recreate it for different audiences.

This is an important consideration when buying software. You may be solving a problem for one team today, but it is worth considering what happens if that team succeeds and usage expands.

Can different departments have processes that fit their work while remaining part of a shared system? Can leadership see across them? Can stakeholders find information without asking the project team to prepare another status report?

Those questions become more important as adoption grows.

7. Plan with confidence instead of reacting to problems

Once enough work has moved through the system, organizations begin accumulating something they often did not have before: a reliable history of how work actually gets done.

How accurate were our estimates? Where do projects repeatedly get stuck? When does demand spike? Which roles become bottlenecks? How much work can the team realistically commit to next month?

At Tampa General Hospital, planning and estimate accuracy improved from 31% to 91%.

That change has practical implications. Better estimates give managers a stronger basis for deciding what the team can commit to, when work can start, and whether there is enough capacity for another initiative.

At Kalamazoo Valley Community College, workload reporting helps identify lower-volume periods that can be used for strategy and planning.

At Rally, team members can see when capacity becomes available and pull work forward themselves.

At Skyline Windows, project health improved from low single digits to 56% of projects on track, while managers use project information to identify stalled work and improve accountability.

Over time, the organization gets better at answering one of the hardest questions in project management:

What can we realistically get done?

That is a valuable capability in its own right. In some organizations, the effect eventually reaches customers and other parts of the business.

8. Turn better project execution into business results

FirstService Residential provides a useful example.

Property onboarding is a complex operational process involving many activities over an extended period. Its South Region standardized an approximately 120-day property-transition process and created a shared source of truth around the work.

The organization reduced property onboarding time by 30% and improved customer retention.

A change in how internal work was managed affected the customer experience.

Mercyhealth saw a different downstream benefit. When the organization received a subpoena requiring historical project information, the team needed to provide Legal with a record of what had happened.

Because that project history had been centralized in Workzone, the relevant information could be exported instead of reconstructed from emails, spreadsheets, documents, shared drives, and people’s memories.

Neither example is likely to appear as a line item on a typical project management software comparison chart. They show what can happen when an organization develops a reliable system for how work is planned, executed, and recorded.

---

What is the ROI of project management software?

The ROI of project management software can come from several sources: additional project capacity, employee time savings, workflow automation, fewer delays, better resource utilization, and improvements in the business processes supported by those projects.

If you are trying to build a business case, one place to start is the cost of coordination.

Imagine a 20-person team where each person spends an average of six hours per week in status meetings, chasing approvals, searching for information, setting up projects, preparing reports, and coordinating work.

That represents 6,240 employee hours per year.

At an average loaded employee cost of $60 per hour, that is approximately $374,400 of employee capacity annually.

Recovering 20% of that time would return approximately 1,248 hours of capacity each year, equivalent to nearly $75,000 in employee capacity at the same loaded hourly cost.

The calculation does not include the potential value of increased project throughput, fewer delays, better planning, improved customer processes, or smarter staffing decisions. It gives you a starting point for putting a value on coordination time that is otherwise distributed across dozens of small activities.

How do you calculate the ROI of project management software?

A useful starting point is:

Team size × weekly hours spent coordinating projects × 52 weeks × loaded hourly employee cost

Then estimate how much of that coordination time a better project management process could realistically eliminate.

For your own evaluation, substitute your team size, an estimate of weekly coordination time, and your approximate employee cost. Even a conservative estimate can help establish how much improvement would be required for a new system to justify the investment.

---

How should you evaluate project management software?

Feature comparisons still have a place in the buying process. They become much more useful once you know which outcomes matter most.

If project volume is growing faster than the team can manage it, look closely at templates, automation, intake, portfolio visibility, and workload management.

If people spend too much time chasing information, examine how status, approvals, ownership, and reporting work in practice.

If deadlines are unpredictable, see how the system surfaces risk, dependencies, and capacity conflicts.

If everyone feels overloaded, ask the vendor to demonstrate how a manager would determine who actually has capacity and where the constraint sits.

If leadership lacks visibility, ask to see exactly what an executive would be able to understand without someone manually assembling a report.

Use one of your own recurring projects during the evaluation. Submit one of your own requests. Give the vendor a workload problem that your managers regularly face. See how the software handles situations that resemble the way your organization actually operates.

Customer evidence is useful here as well. When a vendor says its automation will save time, ask what customers have experienced. When it says its workload tools improve resource planning, ask how customers are using the data. When it says the platform can scale, ask what changed for customers as their usage expanded.

The answers provide context that a feature checklist cannot.

What should you ask during a project management software demo?

When you watch your next project management software demo, picture your team using the system a year from now.

A new request arrives. How easily does it enter the team’s workflow? How much of the process is already defined? How quickly does the right person know what they need to do? What happens when an approval stalls? How does a manager know a deadline is in danger?

Then imagine the workload growing substantially. Can managers still see what needs attention? Can leadership see what the team is accomplishing? Can you identify capacity constraints? Can you tell when additional resources are genuinely needed?

Most importantly, ask:

What would our team be capable of accomplishing with this system that it cannot accomplish today?

Project management software should increase the operating capacity of the team using it. More work can move through the organization. Less employee time is consumed by coordination. Repeatable work becomes easier to execute. Problems become visible earlier. Managers make decisions with better information. Growth becomes easier to absorb.

The tasks, Gantt charts, dashboards, templates, automations, and reports are the mechanisms that support those improvements.

The benefit is what your team becomes capable of accomplishing with them.

---

See what that could look like for your team

Talk to a Workzone expert →

Take a 3-minute tour of Workzone →

Start a free trial →

---

Frequently Asked Questions About Project Management Software

What are the main benefits of project management software?

Project management software like Workzone helps teams complete more projects with the same resources, save time on project coordination, automate recurring workflows, keep deadlines on track, manage workload and capacity, improve visibility, plan more accurately, and achieve better business outcomes.

Workzone customers have reported measurable results across these areas, including increases in completed project throughput of 53% to 109% in specific customer examples and time savings of 5 to 15 hours per person per week for some teams.

Does project management software actually improve productivity?

Yes. Project management software can improve productivity by reducing the administrative work required to plan, assign, track, update, and report on projects.

For example, Regal Medical Group increased annual project volume by 98%, The V Foundation for Cancer Research increased completed project throughput by 87%, and University of Wisconsin increased completed projects by 53%. These are individual Workzone customer results, so outcomes will vary by organization and implementation.

How much time can project management software save?

Time savings depend on the team and its existing processes, but some Workzone customers have reported substantial gains. Baxter Credit Union estimates that Workzone frees 10 to 15 hours per team member per week, while Mercyhealth estimates savings of 5 to 10 hours per person per week. Kansas State University estimates savings of at least one hour per project.

Much of this time comes from reducing manual project setup, status updates, information searches, approval follow-ups, reporting, and other coordination work.

Can project management software help a team complete more projects without adding people?

Yes. One potential benefit of project management software is increasing the amount of work an existing team can manage by reducing coordination overhead, standardizing repeatable processes, and making bottlenecks easier to identify.

Workzone customers provide several examples. Regal Medical Group increased annual project volume by 98% without adding headcount, while Mercyhealth increased project volume by approximately 40% with the same team.

How does project management software help keep projects on schedule?

Project management software gives teams a centralized way to track deadlines, responsibilities, dependencies, workload, and project status. This makes it easier to identify overdue work and potential bottlenecks before they cause larger delays.

For Workzone customers such as the University of Wisconsin, 95% of projects remained on track while completed projects increased by 53%. The V Foundation for Cancer Research maintained 88% of active projects on track while increasing completed project throughput by 87%.

How does project management software help with workload and capacity planning?

Project management software can show managers who is working on what, how much work each person has, where capacity is available, and where bottlenecks are developing. Managers can use that information to rebalance assignments, plan future work, and make better staffing decisions.

At Workzone customers such as Texas State Technical College, workload and capacity data helped support the case for additional hires and budget. The V Foundation for Cancer Research used workload and request data to help justify an additional designer.

Can project management software help justify additional staff?

Yes. When project and workload data are centralized, managers can replace anecdotal statements about being overloaded with evidence showing demand, workload, capacity, and resource constraints.

Texas State Technical College used Workzone capacity and workload data to help make the case for additional hires and budget. The V Foundation for Cancer Research used workload and request data to help justify an additional designer.

How does project management software automate recurring work?

Project management software can turn repeatable processes into reusable templates and automated workflows. Teams can standardize tasks, assignments, timelines, dependencies, and other recurring steps instead of rebuilding the same process for every project.

Among Workzone customers, University of Mary creates 100% of projects from templates or copies, Innovative Print reached 99% template usage, and The V Foundation for Cancer Research creates 97% of projects from templates.

Can project management software work across multiple departments and locations?

Yes. A centralized project management system can give different teams and locations a shared source of project information while allowing each group to manage its own work.

For example, Purdue University uses Workzone as a single source of truth for active and planned work across 11 departments and 92 counties. Tampa General Hospital uses Workzone across 9 departments and more than 600 users, while Texas State Technical College coordinates work across 10 campuses.

What is the ROI of project management software?

The ROI of project management software like Workzone can come from time saved, increased project throughput, fewer delays, better use of existing capacity, workflow automation, improved resource planning, and downstream business improvements.

A simple way to estimate part of the ROI is to calculate the annual cost of time currently spent coordinating projects and estimate how much of that time better processes and automation could recover. Organizations should also consider improvements in throughput, delivery performance, staffing efficiency, and business outcomes.

How long does it take to see benefits from project management software?

The timeline depends on the complexity of the organization, implementation quality, adoption, and the processes being moved into the system. Teams can often begin benefiting from centralized project visibility, standardized workflows, and reduced manual coordination once their core processes and users are established.

Larger improvements in throughput, capacity planning, predictability, and business outcomes generally become easier to measure after the organization has accumulated enough project history to compare performance over time.

How should you evaluate project management software?

Start with the outcomes your team needs rather than a feature checklist. Determine whether you need to complete more projects, reduce coordination time, automate recurring work, improve on-time delivery, manage workload, increase visibility, or improve planning.

Then ask vendors to demonstrate those situations using workflows that resemble your own. Look for customer evidence showing whether organizations have achieved the outcomes the vendor claims its software can deliver. Most importantly, ask for adoption data. That reveals whether the tool is actually making an impact.

Platforms like Workzone specialize in driving impact by making the tool easy for teams to use, wherein users need not have prior project management training. This results in high adoption, which in turn leads to quantifiable results.